Peter Attia· MD
Um, and I'm really happy that I'm seeing that at the age of 35 and not 65.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, and I'm really happy that I'm seeing that at the age of 35 and not 65.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Um, and I'm really happy that I'm seeing that at the age of 35 and not 65.
Um, and yeah, so when we, you know, when we're looking at a 35year-old patient and their zcore is already minus1, I mean, that's just as concerning to me as if their O GTT shows, you know, very elevated postprandial glucose and insulin levels.