The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think uh the the greater benefits are to be expected if they are there on the the tissues that have a higher collagen content and so I think there's still um a wind of opportunity there as a good source of glycine and Proline for recover restoration or repair of collagen rid tissues which could be skin which could be tendon cartilage bone Etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.