The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you got randomized to this low intensity home program we were trying to see whether that worked too of course we knew that that was not going to work because we've got years of experience to know that that is not going to improve bone but we gave them things like walking stretching some body weight lunges and toe raisers and things that would potentially improve their balance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
of course we knew that that was not going to work because we've got years of experience to know that that is not going to improve bone but we gave them things like walking stretching some body weight lunges and Tow raisers and things that would potentially improve their balance so we weren't completely ripping them off