The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we use reactive oxygen species as signaling molecules we use reactive oxygen species for positive processes I don't know the positive is the right word there but we use them for intentional processes for productive means in the human body to fight infections so there were a series of studies that you mentioned in which they were to use antioxidants that didn't really work that well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because we do use oxidative stress to help promote cell growth in the muscle after exercise for example or even to promote healing and fight pathogens and all this stuff
because it turns out that these radical oxygen species also have important roles u they actually are inducing an inflammatory response which can be protective and a good example is uh during ex exercise.