The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's also other metaanalysis of randomized control trials that I'm not going to read here but basically they're not showing a significant benef like cardiovascular mortality benefit so they're not changing cardiovascular mortality in these this is metaanalysis of randomized control trials I have two here basically showing that they're not showing any all cause mortality or cardio vascular significant all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality benefit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.