The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i have to tell you peter ethan this is a dumb idea i mean everybody knows that glycosyria is terrible for the kidneys and this is like it may be lower sugar but in the long run it's going to be but that's the beauty of science that's why you do these big randomized placebo-controlled trials and when the first one came out the emperor reg study about five years ago
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
based on the Barry brener hypothesis I predicted these drugs would save your kidneys uh according to the B brener hypothesis and that's all turned out to be correct these drugs are great for the kidney