The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i guess it just reinforces this idea of intermittent dosing not just intermittent within the week which i think was clearly established by the phase 2a study but even applying a secondary cycle over the course of a year for example
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would do that study Matt in an intermittent way that's the way that I would want to to to do that to sort of mimic a really strong inhibition of this system and then release and see what happens