The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so these confidence intervals just give a sense of how much range you know some people um die die early some people dilate within a given year they're going to be different ages um so it these error bars can account for a lot of different forms of variability here you're talking about the variability is how many people in each group die
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the shading is just showing you in 95 confidence interval so you're just putting basically error bars along this