Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
if it comes from a company that is Indian or Chinese you wouldn't be overly paranoid to assume there's an 80% chance that there's some misinformation in what you're taking which means again that could mean it's still fine that could mean it's not as potent as it says it is it doesn't have the shelf life it says it is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.