The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so one thing you can do is you can uh there are safe harbors in the body by say fibers I mean places that the immune system doesn't usually reach easily um so it just by chance that retina turns out to be one of them um there's not a lot of immune cell infiltration into the retina so you have a chance to use gene therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are now several Gene therapies that have been approved um that allow you to insert um or inject viruses so that you can get um some corrected Gene that's missing or abnormal in in the retina so that's one place