The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so um so again imagine the human genome as a massive Library 80 000 books um printed on a page um and so the old technology the technology that was used with guest Jesse gassinger is the technology in which we uh by analogy I'm using metaphors and that and and analogies here we would insert a new page into that 80 000 page Library
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the librarian could come in this case that immune response the T cell or the B cell immune response and come and say wait a second that's gonna it doesn't belong that's not a page that belongs and that's what happened with Jesse dozinger and other people
in Jesse gelsinger's case it was um the vector in the gene therapy was targeted at the liver we've talked about a little bit of that already um but sometimes there can be an over helming response from the liver um where the liver starts to fail um where there's an immune response um that goes on