The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the 2003 SARS vaccine work there was some real challenges that developed with the animals with something called antibody dependent enhanced with a de where if he made just a little bit of antibody that was bad because then when you got infected with the real thing you had this antibody dependent enhancement there was a shock like picture and it was a real challenge
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.