We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
at these studies that have, you know, number needed to treat around 80 or 100, right? So only one out of every p 80 patients is going to benefit from taking that medication and there's some potential harm you know and ultimately listen the patient should be the one making the choice but they need that information and they don't get that information. Most doctors again don't even know this information to be able to give it to the patients.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.