The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think 50 years ago whipple procedure carried a much higher mortality than today i think 50 years ago women were decimated by radical mastectomies that are i didn't do one radical mastectomy in my residency so basically for 20 years that's a procedure that's never been done and today there's been a push to more and more and more localized surgeries with just as good an outcome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.