Peter Attia· MD
turned out to be a false alarm because they could impact on tiny little tumors in mice before they become vascularized but by the time they were vascularized they would not work in mice
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
turned out to be a false alarm because they could impact on tiny little tumors in mice before they become vascularized but by the time they were vascularized they would not work in mice
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we studied them for three or four years turned out to be a false alarm because they could impact on tiny little tumors in mice before they become vascularized but by the time they were vascularized they would not work in mice at all