Peter Attia· MD
where it works we're talking about a month and a half two months i mean that's about the average
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
where it works we're talking about a month and a half two months i mean that's about the average
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i'm actually thinking of avastin yes okay same time period though avastin was about 2000 2001 maybe 2002. and was it colon cancer for avastin yeah it was the first one yeah
i think the original paper that led to approval was the herwitz paper and i think it was on the order of a couple of months