Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
i think when people are question mark on avastin for colon cancer we're not saying don't treat a person there's still lots of treatments you'd give you give full you give the same treatment except leave out the avastin and the difference is probably very slight maybe there's no difference at all is what somebody like me like might think if i haven't reviewed all the evidence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.