The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think that they're valuable for people who are super sick but again so the way that i think about all of this is like what is the root cause you know there's a lot of therapies within mainstream western medicine that are pharmaceutical and then there's a whole branch of like an add-on to western medicine which is functional medicine right where we also use adjunctive therapies that don't always address the root cause
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.