We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
here you have 3.7 month median improvement in survival for a fraction of the patients for 45 000 dollars instead of 5 000 are you surprised then that 42 of cancer patients were diagnosed today will be completely financially ruined by the second year of their diagnosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how do you tell a 22 year old andrew that we will add four months to your life you should go and celebrate and proclaim from the rooftops what kind of nonsense is this
i remember doing the math it was at a cost of 38 000 for the extra 20 days and i mean i think people listening to this might be understandable to question well who are we to say what 38 000 is worth
there are drugs that are getting approved that make very little sense so they extend median survival by two months without extending overall survival and they're going to cost a hundred thousand dollars