The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
will the effects of that drug linger into the placebo period for one group which is not what's happening to the other group and even if it is um even if you're only doing it with one group are you confounding the effect of that treatment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there might be something about the order of of the the treatments that they receive if they get you know treatment a and then treatment B maybe you know one might have an effect on the other and the really good ones go a b and then ba they divide them into two groups and go a b and b a