Peter Attia· MD
they then went on and gave them chemotherapy and the response rate to the chemotherapy was was 60 to 70 percent astonishing number for patients at that stage in their disease it should have been less than five percent
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they then went on and gave them chemotherapy and the response rate to the chemotherapy was was 60 to 70 percent astonishing number for patients at that stage in their disease it should have been less than five percent
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the patients that had the best response to the best immune response to the um to the vaccine were the ones that were most responsive to therapy suggesting that those that responded you know they had they they developed adaptive strategies