The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the warts of of retox was thought that it was a chimera that we would it had too many mouse parts to human parts and that we would cause um uh human anti-chimeriic antibbody hacka um and FDA was very concerned about this so we measured and measured and measured and it it uh turned out probably because the patients had lymphoma that they didn't get hacka they very tiny numbers and they not clinically relevant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.