The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they have mixed results um some of them have shown that dogs with osteoar arthritis when injected with stem cells uh do tend to improve their gate uh do tend to see a reduction in lameness um which again is you know partially assessed by gate partially assessed by the use of medications or pain relief through medications or other Studies have found no benefits whatsoever
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.