Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
i think it's going to take a little longer than we think i think it's going to probably be not quite as safe as as we think meaning not something you just want to indiscriminately give to everybody in other words i think it's like any vaccine is going to have some risk and it's certainly possible that at least some of those vaccines potentially really efficacious ones may come with side effects that that are undesirable and therefore we'll have to think about who gets them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.