Peter Attia· MD
and by the way of those 90 about 40 were for HIV
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and by the way of those 90 about 40 were for HIV
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
abouts was a couple of years old a little over I don't know I want to say in the neighborhood of 5,000 antiviral inhibitors were proposed in the scientific literature but only 90 of these 9-0 were approved for final use over about a 55 to 60 year period and by the way of those 90 about 40 were for HIV so again I'm not minimizing yeah yeah so if you took HIV out of this we're talking about maybe 50 drugs developed with any efficacy and safety to warrant approval in a 55 60 year period of time
so if you took HIV out of this we're talking about maybe 50 drugs developed with any efficacy and safety to warrant approval in a 55 60 year period of time
it looked at sort of antiviral drug development from about 1963 until present or there abouts was a couple of years old a little over I don't know I want to say in the neighborhood of 5,000 antiviral inhibitors were proposed in the scientific literature but only 90 of these 9-0 were approved for final use