Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
so assuming that it is it is increasing it and then is that actually doing anything um you know the picture that you got sent was uh you know obviously looked pretty impressive and objectively to me it kind of looks like it has some of the Hallmarks of you know fit industry angles and like lighting manipulations and stuff yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I was surprised at how little the effect was if this mechanism matters um and it might not matter right in other words it might be the case that while you know knocking out the myostatin Gene at Birth produces a profound muscular phenotype attenuating the gene later in life might not do much