The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It's unknown why these seizures occur, but it gives us a lot of insight into the brain to understand it, right? From a redux effect, from a neuropharmacology effect. So the grants that I had were literally called you know uh investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms of CNOS oxygen toxicity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.