The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we did was we said okay let's see which of those bits of dna those promoters and enhancers can we borrow from let's say the tyrosine hydroxylase gene this is a gene that helps make dopamine we could go take a little bit of its promoter and we could put that in front of the channelrhodopsin gene package that whole thing up into virus infect cells okay now you inject you can almost administer it systemically at this point and it's going to go exactly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.