The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they went after the prostate indication first got that FDA approval and then did the and had safety studies and such done for that and then pursued the hair loss indication after and it was FDA approved for hair loss as a one milligram dose in 1998
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
finasteride came out in 1992 as procar as procar 5 milligrams of finasteride got it to treat BPH yes then in 1997 the 1 mgram dose came out as prop pcia