Rhonda Patrick· PhD
They're both doing similar things. They're both thermodynamically favorable, they allow glucose sparing, they allow glucose to then be used to make glutathione, which is important in the brain when you have damage.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They're both doing similar things. They're both thermodynamically favorable, they allow glucose sparing, they allow glucose to then be used to make glutathione, which is important in the brain when you have damage.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.