Peter Attia· MD
the kids are it's so interesting kids are not Statin intolerant meaning you don't see kids developing myalgias and statin-related muscle symptoms no at the free because in adults we see that about five percent of the time
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the kids are it's so interesting kids are not Statin intolerant meaning you don't see kids developing myalgias and statin-related muscle symptoms no at the free because in adults we see that about five percent of the time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we have looked at growth mental state and learning ability we've looked at maturation hormones monarchy puberty development and we've never found any negative effect in kids of statins