The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they'll crank it up in lock steps so they'll all move together upward they won't go too much nobody will be an outlier because then you're going to be on 60 minutes and that's no good for your brand so you want to go up together slowly but you can keep cranking it up you can do it nine percent year over year over year over year and when the frog doesn't jump out of the pot when the water is boiled slowly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.