The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and those neurons don't come back once they're dead they're dead and that actually limits your ability even after rehab of being able to experience that same level of reward because now you don't even have the dopamine to be able to do it because those neurons are dead
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what does this mean in human terms you get a hit you get a rush receptors go down next time you need a bigger hit to get the same rush and the receptors go down and then a bigger hit and a bigger hit and a bigger hit until finally you get a huge hit to get nothing that's called tolerance and then when the neurons actually do start to die because chronic stimulation causes neuronal cell death that's called addiction