The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Hence the importance of a company like Fayeth that could start to standardize that. Because, look, everybody wants to do the right thing here. And wouldn't it be great if, as a doctor, you could write a prescription that's not just covering the drug but covering the food? So that's what we're anticipating at Fayeth at some point if you can prove in a clinical trial setting that you need this particular food for the drug to be effective.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.