Peter Attia· MD
and the bottom line was it was taken out the manufacturers uh took it out of the vials just because of all the all the bad publicity swarming around it it there was never evidence to show that it was a problem
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the bottom line was it was taken out the manufacturers uh took it out of the vials just because of all the all the bad publicity swarming around it it there was never evidence to show that it was a problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.