Peter Attia· MD
because you're basically trying to eliminate all the macrofasages in the region so you're actually better off treating larger fields so it's the exact opposite of what we do with cancer therapy
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because you're basically trying to eliminate all the macrofasages in the region so you're actually better off treating larger fields so it's the exact opposite of what we do with cancer therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.