We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but the unfavorable change in clinical practice practice was that the results were extrapolated to women in their 40s and 50s who were taking hormone therapy for treatment of bothersome even distressing hot flashes night sweats and were in generally good hell and they were being denied hormone therapy to relieve these symptoms and that was an inappropriate extrapolation of the findings that was a negative outcome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and I think that the results were perhaps blown out of proportion especially in terms of the use of hormone therapy for a clear indication and FDA approved indication of treatment of hot flashes and night sweats among women in early menopause who had even lower absolute risks than one extra case per thousand women per year and that type of extrapolation really should not have happened