The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
determining significance whether or not the the result could be due to something other than chance of course your confidence in that increases as it becomes typically p-values P less than point zero zero zero zero one percent chance that it's due um to chance right so very low probability P less than 0.05 tends to be the kind of gold standard cut off
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.