We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Kid, do you understand how complex cancer is? I mean, you poke it with a stick. It's not going to care about blocking one thing. I mean, these things have... inordinate number of tricks up their sleeve. Like no way. Right. To think that you're going to poke it once and everything will remain unperturbed except that one thing. And then the idea that that would actually help a patient and that you could learn from it. Both things I think were absolutely not accepted.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.