The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The relevance of that thought process is highly relevant to how we think about developing therapies right now, but it's also highly relevant to understanding this asymptotic limit of chemotherapy, like how it is that you try to poison this DNA replication process and like just sort of shred the DNA a bit more. Radiation, the same concept. Yeah, I mean, radiation even more limited in that it's not systemic.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.