The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A lot of our GBMs though are reected hopefully fully resected in terms of rad at least radiographic the posttop MRI not showing any enhancement if you have someone that's got a fully rected primary who's a younger patient with not a lot of neurological deficit uh they can live a couple of years actually
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.