The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my bare minimum is that I've got to say to them I want you to be aware that I have no data on this over many decades we only have a few years I want you to be aware that it was only tested thoroughly in these populations which is not your population and you need to know that there are the as Rumsfeld famous said the unknown unknowns
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.