The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
prior to probably 1970 or maybe 1980 it was very prevalent even in the US it was very widely done so this is kind of everyone I talk to them about it now it sounds like I'm doing something experimental and radical but if you go over to Germany again going back to ankylosing spondilitis papers in 19 1898 uh they've done they do something like I hear between 20 and 50,000 patients a year in Germany
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.