Peter Attia· MD
and then we moved into the dose range where we thought we'd be doing biology in the knee and we saw what happened
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then we moved into the dose range where we thought we'd be doing biology in the knee and we saw what happened
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we had 6 dose levels and so they were marched up from essentially a group of a series of doses three of them which we based on some modeling we did and in cell culture we thought would be sub pharmacologically active doses so we thought they'd be semi and active or inactive entirely