The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the thing is i wasn't doing any outlandish things here okay these are all treatments for lung cancer okay i mean like like you said gems are is used more for other things but this is not an outlandish thing that's never heard of for lung cancer i mean same with cisplatin i mean um none of these things are you know you know i was oh my goodness we're gonna you know do something you know that's never ever been done before you know so to speak
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
believe it or not there's no standard chemo for lung cancer it's can you believe that there's not a standard like standard of care regimen