Peter Attia· MD
so you know whether that trial was actually a failure it was a failure in the sense that they didn't get to FDA approval and they shut it down early whether it was actually a failure of the drug I think Still Remains TBD
Loading…
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
so you know whether that trial was actually a failure it was a failure in the sense that they didn't get to FDA approval and they shut it down early whether it was actually a failure of the drug I think Still Remains TBD
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I always always worried that the change and sort of use of molecules reflected that that original study maybe maybe it had some issues that we're not aware of right because it it that first study that we talked about as a milestone study was was so amazing right that why wouldn't you have expanded upon that it never I never understood this