The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i mean it's pretty remarkable that that was even conceptualized much less achieved technically and as you alluded to it was really their realization that not only was the procedure so technically demanding that the risk of early mortality was quite high but you were doing it in an immunologic setting that just was not successful and so you know even the patients that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.