The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you inject the incision site with markane before you cut you wait a moment you then make the incision and then immediately following surgery you put the patient on a pretty aggressive dose of nsaids many patients can actually avoid narcotics postoperatively for the incisional pain which is the dominant source of pain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he was convinced that the only reason surgeons didn't want to do this was because nobody wants to inject and stand there for 10 minutes with your thumb up your ass waiting for the bupivocaine to seep into the tissues and maybe it's anecdotal but it really seemed to work right like it really seemed to work that you would do this inguinal hernia repair or you know at the time some small laparottomy or what whatever it was anything and if you were willing to put that bupivocaine in and sit there and wait and I'm trying to think we might have used epi with lidocaine as well so it might have been a little epi with lidocaine plus bupivocaine or something like that and you had to be super due diligent about keeping the acetaminophen and ibuprofen levels up