Paul Saladino· MD
and and this what we're doing is we are bypassing part of the small intestine and how interesting that that this decreases these endogenous cannabinoids being created
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and and this what we're doing is we are bypassing part of the small intestine and how interesting that that this decreases these endogenous cannabinoids being created
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they essentially reroute where the stomach connects by taking the esophagus cutting the stomach here and then attaching this sort of blind pouch lower in in in the process so do we think to that lower part uh or the upper part of the small intestine that they bypass exactly where these fat receptors are that's where the process of making these endocannabinoids happens so somewhere in the duodenum