Peter Attia· MD
well by chance alone aren't some of these trials going to be positive i mean we're not using a very stringent nominal cutoff for significance we're using a p of .05 usually some are gonna be positive by chance alone
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well by chance alone aren't some of these trials going to be positive i mean we're not using a very stringent nominal cutoff for significance we're using a p of .05 usually some are gonna be positive by chance alone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.